Can anyone recommend a good LJ layout?
Nov. 11th, 2012 11:32 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
ETA 11/18/12 : I've decided to go with Blue Woodcut for now, although it doesn't use Ariel-style font (or have tags in a column. I can deal.) It's actually quite similar to the Weston series template
gabrielleabelle used but is not completely identical, and rarely seen (at least in this corner of the Buffy-fandom sandbox I play around in.) And: pretty. Easy on the eyes counts for a lot. Thanks everyone for your suggestions.
*****************************************
Exactly what the title says: I chose this particular template because it had: black print on white ground (hey, I'm getting older, kids - readability? It's an issue - and if it is for me, then....); color around the edges to catch the eye; fairly clean and simple graphic layout; and, the tags were visible. (The template I originally chose was nice, but tags were not visible, so why even bother?)
But - now it's starting to irk me. It feels as though the text is squeezed in too narrowly, and thus my icon becomes more prominent right at the top of each post (or maybe I need to downsize my icons), which distracts my eyes visually when I put a photo at the top of the post.
So, if anyone can recommend another layout - and, oh yeah, it has to be one of the free ones.
I'm not "fussy" - I prefer "particular", thanks muchly.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
*****************************************
Exactly what the title says: I chose this particular template because it had: black print on white ground (hey, I'm getting older, kids - readability? It's an issue - and if it is for me, then....); color around the edges to catch the eye; fairly clean and simple graphic layout; and, the tags were visible. (The template I originally chose was nice, but tags were not visible, so why even bother?)
But - now it's starting to irk me. It feels as though the text is squeezed in too narrowly, and thus my icon becomes more prominent right at the top of each post (or maybe I need to downsize my icons), which distracts my eyes visually when I put a photo at the top of the post.
So, if anyone can recommend another layout - and, oh yeah, it has to be one of the free ones.
I'm not "fussy" - I prefer "particular", thanks muchly.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-12 01:31 am (UTC)My question - how do you get that wallpaper imagery in the background of it? Do you have to have a paid account to be able to do that?
no subject
Date: 2012-11-12 10:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-12 06:44 pm (UTC)I'll give that a go in the near-future, thanks! I looked at all the templates recommended to me here, and there are quite a few nice ones. Choosing will be hard. (I'm not famous for my decisiveness, alas.)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-12 06:54 pm (UTC)You can use Photobucket or Tinypic, it doesn't matter, you have to take the http of the image you like and modify the custom stylesheet. (Mine, for example, is now blue) Download a picture you like, take the http for desktop with Photobucket or Tinypic and modify the custom.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-12 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-12 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-12 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 08:04 pm (UTC)But I do like it for the reasons you list.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-11 09:28 pm (UTC)I do like the templates used by stormwreath and 2maggie2, but the contrast between the colored background and text is not enough for me - and it's weird, but at first I had been trying to avoid a template I associated too much with another person's LJ (which is ridiculous, right? there's no way for every one of us to have our own template.)
That said, I like the look of gabrielleabelle's LJ quite a lot - it was probably the first one I happened upon this year, when discovering Buffy fandom - but I suspect it's only available to paid accounts?
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 03:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 03:50 pm (UTC)BTW - I notice you're stories are mostly on DW now, and I'm not feeling up to creating yet another account there. But you're here from there, so are LJ and DW linked somehow?
(Also, your story "Fractured" and "Innocence (Remix)" are AMAZING. Two of my favorite Buffyverse stories.)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 04:11 pm (UTC)Due to LJ's stupidity, I've decided I'm not using my LJ id at all if not completely necessary (for the comms I moderate). I'm so fed up with them!
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 05:28 pm (UTC)I'm so fed up with them!
I've read a lot of people say they were switching to DW and complain about LJ, but I'm not sure what the jist of the complaints are about, other than "for Buffyverse writing LJ is dead and DW is where the action is at. Care to elaborate on what bugs you about it? (aka "I'm hoping I don't regret just starting this LJ, damn it".)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 05:42 pm (UTC)Frankly, LJ disgusts me and the only reason I'm still participating at all is due to the fact that so much of the fandom is "old-school" and rooted and doesn't want to move.
I feel much safer and welcomed at DW. They give a crap about the userbase, specifically fandom, and I've never had a query or idea go unanswered. In addition, their TOS is much more fandom-friendly, and they have continued to stand up for the rights of their users to post as they please, in spite of the fact that it has cost them revenue (Paypal refused to allow DW to use them as a payment method unless TOS was changed; DW refused and is doing without that method as a result).
I'm not trying to discourage you, honestly. I just want you to be prepared: if there are things you really like about LJ, know that they'll likely change and you'll have no say in the matter. If that doesn't bother you, then...have at it!! :)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 05:48 pm (UTC)Follow the instructions (i.e. type in "red_satin_doll.livejournal.com") and hit the Login button. After you do this, you should be taken to an LJ page that asks for your permission for LJ to share info with DW (this will basically just link to your journal/profile). I think there will be two options: just this once, or all the time. I'd pick the second. I think that any time you're on DW from then on, you should remain "logged in" with your OpenID from LJ. You can comment and subscribe to journals using that.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 06:09 pm (UTC)Anyhow, I went to the link from my inbox, and I don't get the page you describe when I hit the Login button. It take me to another DW page asking for my DW account or create a new one. I don't see the options you describe anywhere.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-19 01:29 am (UTC)http://ext-1375912.dreamwidth.org/read
no subject
Date: 2012-11-19 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-19 09:20 pm (UTC)And keeping in mind what you said about LJ vs DW, it's not out of the question that I'd eventually end up switching too.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 05:49 pm (UTC)I really hate LJ.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 06:02 pm (UTC)One thing I hate about LJ myself is how complicated it can be to format entries even in Rich Text. I had no such problem in Blogger; for instance if I have to edit that one fic I posted here (untitled), I have to add extra lines of space between all the paragraphs every single damn time. But not with metas. So again with the Huh?
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 06:13 pm (UTC)Do you recommend C&P instead? (I have been writing directly here because when I start drafts on my computer they tend to not ever get finished.) Or does that just create more headaches? I use Pages on my Apple computer, but I can convert to pdfs.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-19 12:47 am (UTC)