![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
But first, I want to take a moment to wish HAPPY BIRTHMONTH to m'lady
snogged: funny, kind-hearted, generous with her time and support and oh-so-talented. I was stumped as to what to do for a birthday present this year but
velvetwhip gifted her with a fantastic Riley, Willow S4 drabble "Not So NIce Guy" that really packs a wallop (or at least a very strong "ouch") in just a few short lines. Check it out. (And yes, I happen to ship Riley/Willow. Didn't everyone when they first watched S4?)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
********
Now, onto today's feature: THANK YOU again to everyone who voted in
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Full disclosure: I was rooting for TT's Drusilla icon in the tiebreaker voting. More Dru icons are a needful thing and I love the meta-ness of the starlight texture - with Dru it's not just a pretty background - as well as the softness and coloring. But there were so many great icons that choosing was once again incredibly difficult. As happens so often, I noticed a consistency to the entries across the board, regardless of who made them. This time it was in terms of color choices, with cream/ecru, orange, green, and faded blue-grey predominating with touches of deep pink. So for the banner, I adapted a photograph I snapped in my front yard a couple of days ago to coordinate. Original photo behind cut, along with banners, entries and alt icons from rounds 42 and 44.



Banners and icons by your's truly; Art Nouveau Caps font from dafont.com; art nouveau frame from a design by riccus on deviantart.com.
My entries for Round 44:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. 





If 2 and 5 look familiar, they should. I couldn't resist returning to that photo to play with it again. I still don't know who the original photographer was, alas; if anyone has the inside scoop on that, please let me know. Let's pretend that I did not look at #5 when I finished it and think to myself, If I can't win Best Color with that, then I never will. Nope, such impure thoughts never entered my mind. And by the way, that bridge in Brooklyn can be yours with a low down payment and 0% financing.....
My entries for Round 42, which I forgot to post previously, including Mod's Choice Winner #6:
My entries for Round 42, which I forgot to post previously, including Mod's Choice Winner #6:
6.
7.
8. 



Alts/extras:
9.
10.
11.
12.
13. 
14.
15.
16.
17.
18. 





14.





18.
19.
20.
21.
22. 





I don't personalize my own icons very often so I wanted to give it a try. The "Shanghai" font in #16 is from ipiccy; Art Nouveau Caps in 18 - 22 is from dafont.com.
There were alt versions of #4, involving the First Slayer seeming to creep up on Willow...and I deleted those. There is no way to use an image as problematic and unintentionally racist as the First Slayer (aka "The Magical Negro") and not be part of the very problem I decry unless I use the image specifically to highlight how troublesome it is. And my icons weren't doing that; they just had a mildly creepy-erotic vibe so I chucked them. Not that focusing on the mighty-white Buffyverse and making caps of white folks and focusing on their beauty to the exclusion of the majority of the world's population isn't a whole heapin' helping of problematic in and of itself. But I digress.
There were alt versions of #4, involving the First Slayer seeming to creep up on Willow...and I deleted those. There is no way to use an image as problematic and unintentionally racist as the First Slayer (aka "The Magical Negro") and not be part of the very problem I decry unless I use the image specifically to highlight how troublesome it is. And my icons weren't doing that; they just had a mildly creepy-erotic vibe so I chucked them. Not that focusing on the mighty-white Buffyverse and making caps of white folks and focusing on their beauty to the exclusion of the majority of the world's population isn't a whole heapin' helping of problematic in and of itself. But I digress.
*******
The geek-y, tech-y portion of the program: I took some snaps of the azaleas in my front yard the other day with my Nikon Coolpix 300 on the "Food" setting. I added glow, brightness and ambrotype filters and yadda yadda (I don't write this stuff down, are you kidding?) as well as several textures including a bokeh-look effect from Graphic Stock and the photo on the right. I pointed my camera at the trees outside my bedroom door and shook it while I snapped the picture. Does double-duty as a blur and/or brushstroke texture! You're welcome.


Photographs by your's truly, 2015 - and did you know that work can be copyrighted pseudonymously? Nifty, huh?
These banners presented a couple of very challenging problems for me: adapting the frame image to get the colors and transparency I wanted; and adding a font from a source outside of ipiccy. One if ipiccy's biggest drawbacks for me is the severely limited range of font options. I typed the text I wanted in a Pages doc using the one art nouveau style font I had on my Mac hardrrive; the font color was an educated guess on my part while I literally eyeballed the banner image. I converted the Pages doc to a pdf, which in turn had to be converted to a PNG file so I could work with it as a layers in ipiccy. Then I cropped every individual line or text element of the PNG, including the "RSD" stamp, to create several separate PNG's that I could manipulate freely in Layer Mode. For instance, the last line "Challenge 44" and the date, is actually two separate layers. The "multiply" filter to darkened the font slightly, with further small adjustments to saturation, brightness etc.
Every time I needed to add a new word of text that I'd forgotten the first time, I had to go back to the Pages file, save the changes, then override both the pdf and the PNG files. This was after I gave up trying to add the text directly using PS Elements 12. (For the record, I did try. Someday I'll know what I'm doing.) If I hadn't been at home sick from work for a few days I would have gone the path of least resistance and made do with a preset ipiccy font. Yay for downtime.
********
Many many thanks of gratitude and praise to my lovely Muse,
velvetwhip, for whom no query is to tedious ( "Is the text legible? Is the design cluttered? Is this any good, even?" ) or beneath her consideration. She's been utterly invaluable to me as a working partner and as a friend - feedback, conversation, inspiration - even if and when I don't show her what I'm working on. As it happens, we've recently had conversations about our shared taste for late 19th - early 20th century graphic arts and design (arts and crafts, art nouveau, art deco), as well as silent and early Hollywood cinema; I'm sure those conversations were indirect inspirations for the design of both the banner and the Best Color icon.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
**********
And now a final word from our sponsors: Deadline to enter Challenge 45 "Potentials" is Friday May 29th at your timezone. And today is your last day to cast tiebreaker votes for five categories at
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
no subject
Date: 2015-05-25 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-26 06:23 am (UTC)I loved all your icons in this round and again I think I voted for all of them.
I DO still look at the voting thread (is that wrong?) and I saw that. Thank you sweetheart - it made me blush because I knew there was no way you could know, you were voting with your eyes and judgement. (Which is what you'd do even if you did know, of course.) I think I'm still blushing.
no subject
Date: 2015-05-26 12:26 pm (UTC)it made me blush because I knew there was no way you could know, you were voting with your eyes and judgement. I try. Sometimes it can be overwhelming with all the icons, so sometimes I don't really "see" all the icons. Afterwards I'll think to myself 'why didn't I vote for that icon?'
(Which is what you'd do even if you did know, of course.) I certainly hope so.
Congrats again on your awards.
no subject
Date: 2015-05-29 04:35 am (UTC)That happens to me ALL the time. I used to occasionally vote from a computer away from home and found that the different screen could make a huge difference in my perception (also if I'm tired, rushed, etc)
This round was frustrating because I swear i could have voted four separate times and come up with four entirely different sets of choices, and each as valid as the others.
And thank you again very much!
no subject
Date: 2015-05-25 08:45 pm (UTC)Your work is simply outstanding, oh yes it is!
Gabrielle
no subject
Date: 2015-05-26 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-25 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-26 12:04 am (UTC)I really like 20 too with its softer tones.
I like that one quite a bit too - it's 19 with one of my favorite light textures (in the collection in my harddrive) set on "screen".
If you're interested I could personalize for you, just say the word. It can be that font or another one, I adore art nouveau fonts as you can tell. (I wonder how "Double Dutchess" would look? "DD" just sort of evokes dunkin donuts for me, but we could go that route too.)
no subject
Date: 2015-05-26 01:04 am (UTC)About the text: Double Dutchess would be nice, but probably too long? DD would also be fine with me -- it never occurred to me that people might be thinking of Dunkin' Donuts, as we don't have it here. Let's just hope you're only one with that association :-)
And I like the art nouveau font.
no subject
Date: 2015-05-26 05:20 am (UTC)http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/red_satin_doll/51574655/339866/339866_900.png
http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/red_satin_doll/51574655/339532/339532_900.png
On the second one I finally figured out how to get a color that would coordinate somewhat with her lips (I'd tried to do that with #20 and didn't quite figure it out.)
ETA: The irony of font being so important to banners for a "textless" icon challenge is only NOW just occurring to me.
no subject
Date: 2015-05-28 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-28 11:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-26 08:06 am (UTC)But, as you mentioned that First Slayer thing... As you seem to be a person whom I can ask it without starting a flame war or unintentionally offending you.
What is this "First Slayer racist" thing and where it comes from? I see a lot of it on tumblr, but it never gets explained, and I simply don't get it. (And I don't think I could ask it there without getting tons of hate mail.)
There is a character from pre-historic times. She is black. Because humanity originates from Africa and pre-historic people WERE black.
How it's automatically becomes so obviously terrible, that Americans don't even need to explain, why it's racist?
Part 1
Date: 2015-05-26 12:55 pm (UTC)Race is a huge sore spot in the United States, to put in mildly, a huge wound in the national psyche and our greatest shame - we have not achieved anywhere near parity or equality no matter the skin color of our president (and btvs was made pre-Obama) The First Slayer could have been an interesting concept but first of all, she's a concept, a plot device, NOT a person. She repeats an old trope that whites in America, especially liberals, use when they want to show how "enlightened" they are about race.
Did you read the link about the "Magical Negro" I provided? It's a character who is not a person but a plot device who exists only to pass mystical wisdom and guidance onto the story's white protagonists They are rarely a fully-rounded human being in and of themselves. They might be negro, hispanic, asian or native american, but that they are non-white and the protagonists is white is the key thing. It's a trope seen over and over and over in countless American movies and tv shows to such an extent that for decades it was unremarkable. You still see the trope in a recent movie like Silver Linings Playbook - a black character who we see for just a few seconds here and there in the movie suddenly dominates a scene to teach the white protagonists how to dance better and "black it up." (See also Strictly Ballroom.) And its still employed by writers who want to demonstrate that they are "not racists" by throwing a minor character of color into the story, rather than writing stories about the lives of characters of color.
In Restless The First Slayer has no voice of her own, and a white woman has to speak for her. (Tara) POC's are routinely silenced by the narratives written by whites, both in the stories themselves and in historically real life, in terms of being enslaved, denied education, denied their identities. They have had their homelands and their names taken away, their countries have been invaded, colonized, denuded of their riches and resources.
That Tara wears the costume of yet another ethnic culture not her own - she is dressed in a "sari" and earrings that suggest India, rather than as a European or Celtic wiccan, in other words, closer to her own culture. So we have two colonized cultures being - colonized by the narrative. The makeup and "costume" of the First Slayer is the worst white stereotype of "the primitive" and looks like nothing you'll in any African culture. Her movements are animalistic, apelike, she sniffs and prowls like an animal and has no voice. This in in line with the white European concept of African culture as a monolith (one culture) that is essentially primitive, uneducated, unintelligent. Then she violently attacks the white main characters, a reflection of white fears about black people.
Apparently someone pointed out the problem of the First Slayer being voiceless so they changed that for Intervention in S5 but everything else remains unchanged. We only see her one more time, in S7 and then only very briefly when she attacks Buffy in a dream. We do not see her during the Shadowmen ceremony, only a shadow and a scream. The narrative of the Shadowmen, who are depicted as villains - black men gang-raping little girls, taking away their voices and identities - is repeated by the narrative of the series itself.
(CONT to Part 2)
Part 2 - please read part 1 first!
Date: 2015-05-26 12:59 pm (UTC)BtVS tries to address race and FAILS over and over. And sadly, the more the creators try to demonstrate "diversity" and sensitivity in matters of race and ethnicity, the harder they stumble. In season 2, the two women of color on the show (Kendra and Jenny) are both killed, violently. Sunnydale, a California town, has zero hispanic population, which is absurd. They try again in S7 with multicultural Slayers, but they still fail. In fact, the core concept, that Buffy, white, blond, middle-class, is the BEST, the longest-lived Slayer, the only girl in thousands of years who can figure out how to unlock the "curse" of "one girl in all the world" is deeply problematic in and of itself. (The other Slayers we see die - Kendra, Nikki, and Xin Rong are all women of color and the narrative implies or says outright that they were somehow inferior to Buffy, not as smart, as intuitive, that they failed in ways where she succeeded.)
Get It Done is another egregious example. The First Slayer is glimpsed very briefly in Buffy's dream at the beginning, but when they do the ritual and relive the fact that she was chained up and given her power by demons in an act of mystical rape, we don't see the First Slayer herself, only the puppet shadow. Buffy who relives the trauma on her behalf and "solves" the initial problem. So the First Slayer is still silenced by the narrative and worse still, the scene with the Shadowmen plays out as a scene of black men gang-raping a white woman. Given the fact that within the last century black men in the United States as young as 15 (Everett Till) were lynched and beaten to death by whites for supposedly "whistling" or looking at a white woman, or accused of raping white women without a proper court hearing, that is a sensitive matter and someone should have been more aware and vetted that episode.
And I haven't even addressed the badness of "Spike's duster" being seen as a symbol for coolness and the power and style of a black woman, her very skin, stolen by a white man. It's back to Silver Linings playbook and countless films where white people steal some of their coolness, their hipness, from POC. The narrative had chances to address this - but then fails to. Spike beats Robin to a pulp in LMPTM and dares tell him that his mother, who he didn't know except as a warrior, didn't love him. (Again, given the history we have in the US of black men being beaten to death, disfigured and lynched by whites in the 20th century, someone SHOULD have paid more attention to that scene.)
I hope this helps? There are people who have addressed the issue far better than I can.
Re: Part 2 - please read part 1 first!
Date: 2015-05-26 01:40 pm (UTC)The thing with First Slayer's voice never even occured to me. (Probably because I perceived her not as a separate character, but as a figment of Buffy's imagination. Like - it's not how First Slayer really looked\talked, but how Buffy visualised her. I found weird that Buffy gave her Tara's voice, and never really knew what to think of it...)
And I couldn't agree more about lack of POC in Sunnydale. Even from my corner of Europe it looked strange (considering that I watched Buffy after Veronica Mars).
Yes, writers are not intentionally racist, and they don't killing non-white\non-straight characters out of direct prejudice. It's supernatural show, people get killed left and right as a genre requirement.
The issue is that non-white\non-straight people don't recieve the roles, that would grant them solid chance to survive.
Re: Part 2 - please read part 1 first!
Date: 2015-05-27 05:24 am (UTC)And I have been wanting to post these ideas for a while - I have mentioned them in another post (and I recall arguing with someone on the subject who I think was simply determined to be argumentative) and my very first icontest entries - to Otherworldlyrics - included icon an icon of Nikki lying dead in Fool For Love because I wanted to make a point about how POC's were erased from the narrative. But I never really did anything "formal" beyond that. But a meta post would not be a bad idea.
I haven't seen Veronica Mars yet, is it any different to btvs in it's portrayal of diversity? I find American TV to be well night awful, even now.
It's supernatural show, people get killed left and right as a genre requirement. The issue is that non-white\non-straight people don't recieve the roles, that would grant them solid chance to survive.
YES.
There's also two other issues, IMO: 1) that the writers are claiming to be "enlightened" (liberal) which means, they do not wish to be identified as racist. In order not to be called racist, you need to educated yourself, not make dumb mistakes of the sort the writers of btvs made repeatedly. (And Joss wrote Restless, let's not forget. His show, his responsibility.)
So the sort of tropes I've been talking about are all the more egregious because their designed for the psychological comfort of the white middle class writers and largely white middle class audiences they assume are watching. Which leads to and intersects with the next issue:
2) It's not that a character dies (this is a freakin' violent show as you point out) in and of itself that is bad; it's the how and why that matter. It's the pile-on of errors and unexamined biases as reflected in the writing. It's the patterns that are reflected in the larger culture, that the writers have learned and unknowingly fail to examine.
Re: Part 2 - please read part 1 first!
Date: 2015-05-27 05:34 am (UTC)Gabrielle
Re: Part 2 - please read part 1 first!
Date: 2015-05-27 01:07 pm (UTC)BTW, have you seen this website, Without Sanctuary? It's a collection of photographs of lynchings, many of which were sold as postcards, ranging from 1900 to 1960, that was published in book form. Truly horrific
http://withoutsanctuary.org/main.html
(The fact that I do not have ONE single user pic out of 110 of a POC is not lost on me btw.)
Re: Part 2 - please read part 1 first!
Date: 2015-05-27 07:49 am (UTC)It's much better than Buffy in this particular aspect. Two of the main cast characers are POC (one - herione's best frend, the other - her antagonist\reluctant ally), and from my point of view VM world at least felt like USA (when Buffy's world felt like some generic fantasy town).
Re: Part 2 - please read part 1 first!
Date: 2015-05-27 01:00 pm (UTC)Unfortunately, that's a bit of a trope right there - the "best friend" who is somehow Other (black/ gay/ etc) to prove that not only the white protagonist but the white writers/creators are "not racist" and often in contrast to other characters on the show.
But other folks have rec'd the show to me so I'm certainly willing to watch the program.
Buffy's world felt like some generic fantasy town
It occurs to me that BtVS is a total fantasy (vampires, anyone? And "Pretty blond former cheerleader and ex-mean girl befriends two of the "outcasts" near the bottom of the social ladder" is probably the biggest fantasy in the show *lol*) But the show's attempts demonstrate that there was some awareness on the part of the writers but the evidence of the show itself proves there wasn't enough awareness.
BTW, I need to make a correction, thanks to
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/till/filmmore/index.html
Re: Part 2 - please read part 1 first!
Date: 2015-05-28 10:12 pm (UTC)Re: Part 2 - please read part 1 first!
Date: 2015-05-29 03:46 am (UTC)If you are interested in the subject of race (and the intersection of race and gender in the buffyverse and fandom, perhaps THE place to start is "Origin Stories", a fanvideo made by
Taken together it's a masterclass in the art of using fandom creativity to interrogate race and gender privilege.
Re: Part 2 - please read part 1 first!
Date: 2015-05-30 12:47 am (UTC)Re: Part 2 - please read part 1 first!
Date: 2015-06-01 05:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-26 11:57 am (UTC)*squish*
Excellent work on your art and thanks for sharing your process!
no subject
Date: 2015-05-26 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-27 11:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-26 12:28 pm (UTC)The banners are amazing. I love the Art Nouveau style.
no subject
Date: 2015-05-27 08:32 pm (UTC)I actually have more color and saturation variations of 11, 12 , 13, those were the simplest and end up the best I think. That image is just amazing. I still want to know who took the photograph. (And kudos to the folks who scanned it/put it online. The quality is superb and so much easier to work with for icons than any screen caps of course.) It's just a dream of an image.
Thank you very much for the compliments Kiki! And oh, I didn't know you like art nouveau - I've been passionate about the style since I was a teenager and the love hasn't waned, although I've developed a taste for more spartan styles alongside.
no subject
Date: 2015-05-28 10:48 am (UTC)And your entries were terrific! That shot of Sarah is stunning and you definitely did her justice with your icons <3
ETA: I don't know who the photographer was for the Sarah image but it comes from an Eqsuire shoot here
no subject
Date: 2015-05-29 04:29 am (UTC)http://magazines.famousfix.com/tpx_2868280/esquire-magazine-united-kingdom-december-2004/
It was James White, if you look in the lower left corner of the scan.
I first became aware of White about ten years ago in connection with photos of Nicole Kidman (he may have done some still photos for the movie Moulin Rouge but I honestly can't recall.)
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-cnPySv6fgZs/Um_dOvOGhPI/AAAAAAABZ_I/IVES5APVdZE/s1600/Nicole+Kidman+-+Photographed+by+James+White11.jpg
And THANK YOU so so much for the lovely compliments!
no subject
Date: 2015-07-08 02:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-08 09:17 pm (UTC)I really just adore that image of SMG, as you can tell - its to die for.