Re: Sorry for the late response!

Date: 2013-07-04 08:19 pm (UTC)
And if you DO use photo reference, unless it's a stock photo, then to be safe you should have the photographer's permission, which usually involved paying them something.

But people certainly get around that. It depends on whether or not the original artist/photographer catches it, and has the resources themselves to pursue action. This is of course where corporations have huge advantages over individual artists.

The whole copyright/trademark thing does get pretty complex, doesn't it? A few years back my partner and I tried to study it and even went to a legal group for artists in NYC, so we could figure out what to put down on the contracts with her clients, and there were only more questions than answers.

I've got friends who basically make their living selling fan art.

I'd better not mention this to my sweetie, who hopes to make an income in retirement from her paintings. (Which are good, but an actual income? Not so sure about that.) Unfortunately she's not a fan of anything in particular, so that would be a no-go.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Profile

red_satin_doll: (Default)
red_satin_doll

June 2021

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 10:46 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios