now I'm trying to remember who had that conversation about this subject
frellingtralk had one not too long ago. I don't know if that's the one you mean, though.
Was there a point to having it be Xander?
Not really. I believe the original premise was a him doing a spell to cheat on a test... don't hold me to that. I'm sure there would have been a moral to the story, but it wouldn't have measured up to what we got.
Not sure where the WTF-ery is in that
Oh, there's no WTFery in making it all about Buffy (I like it that myself, which is why I like the later seasons more). It's in the cross-purposing statement of making the show all about Buffy then claiming it's an ensemble.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2013-04-25 05:46 pm (UTC)P/A = Passive-Aggressive.
now I'm trying to remember who had that conversation about this subject
frellingtralk had one not too long ago. I don't know if that's the one you mean, though.
Was there a point to having it be Xander?
Not really. I believe the original premise was a him doing a spell to cheat on a test... don't hold me to that. I'm sure there would have been a moral to the story, but it wouldn't have measured up to what we got.
Not sure where the WTF-ery is in that
Oh, there's no WTFery in making it all about Buffy (I like it that myself, which is why I like the later seasons more). It's in the cross-purposing statement of making the show all about Buffy then claiming it's an ensemble.