red_satin_doll (
red_satin_doll) wrote2013-04-17 12:25 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
"Welcome to the Hellmouth" / "Bring on The Night"


"You're standing at the mouth of Hell. And it's about to open up." *
***
"I'm beyond tired. I'm beyond scared.
I'm standing on the mouth of Hell and it's going to swallow me whole. And it'll choke on me." **
* Joss Whedon
** Marti Noxon & Douglas Petrie
** Marti Noxon & Douglas Petrie
no subject
I think the real reason she was annoyed was because she thought it was something the cast should have featured in together and not just Sarah
Which I suppose could still could be a rationalization for other issues - or more annoyance on a pile of others. As you say, Aly's issues. Obviously they weren't "tight" anymore if they'd ever been in reality. But Sarah having her own covers and interviews was hardly anything new (there's lots of video interview with her from back in the day on YouTube). She was THE star of the show. It's All. About. Buffy. (contrary to popular opinion.) Take away "Willow" or any other major character and the show can still function; f.ex. DB, MN, ASH. Take away Buffy and you've got - a spin-off version. The only contrary example that comes to mind is Valerie Perrine dropping out/fired from "Valerie"; Sandy Duncan stepped in and it became "Valerie's Family." (And that is the only time you'll see it mentioned in the same breath as BtVS.) Was that the same show, a spin-off, or both?
In any case, doesn't the magazine makes the decisions as to who/what it wants to cover? Or is it also on the actor's manager/agent? In any case, I'd say Aly got the last laugh, career-wise.
no subject