http://red-satin-doll.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] red-satin-doll.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] red_satin_doll 2013-09-04 09:02 pm (UTC)

but we really do have standards when it comes to our authors and artists.

But of course - why have awards otherwise? (Keep in mind you're talking to someone who believed when she was a girl that the members of AMPAS actually watched every movie that came out that year before voting on the Academy Awards. Silly me.) I guess I'm just rather stubborn in terms of recogizing quality; sometimes the best writing is also well-read and recognized, but not always. I think awards should judge QUALITY, regardless of popularity. (That's what stats are for.)

I was very proud to participate in the Absence of LIght awards this past year, and we had multiple criteria for judging, so it was pretty rigourous, which I wouldn't have any other way.

I am proud to call this awards site my baby :)

As well you should be! I'm looking forward to the next round. (I know that the Wicked Awards already has a meta catagory, I wonder if you would consider adding that some time in the future?)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org